This article, what can I say. I am just a bit flabbergasted. Now we are
an inferior being? Oh I understand, the Unequal Being is survived by
the inferior being. Because of DNA research, obviously they can no
longer make claims that something is billions of years old. But now
they expect me to swallow that we are cross bread of Homo sapiens and
Neanderthals. This article states that, "that theory has been debunked
by DNA analysis, but the debate continues." What debate? The discussion
is over!
It seems to me by reading this article we are seeing
an even bigger story than the subject of this article. In what is being
stated is a sense of insecurity as to what the truth really is. The
author uses expressions like "but seem to point" and "for approximately
30,000 years" and "was seemingly", and this last one "Fossils
indicate". You can make "Fossils indicate" what ever you want to argue.
What I am seeing here, which is the good news about this
article is the author's intimidation by the advances in modern science
and technology. He is very careful to stay in a safe position for fear
of scrutiny.
In my opinion, the shady history of the secular
anthropologists and their insane boasts over the last couple of hundred
years, and even right into our day, are now, to borrow a expression
from this author, "are seemingly" motivated by their want for more
money to fund their so called expeditions and experiments. If the
anthropologist of a generation ago stuck to what was found to be true
and honest, they would have to find another way to financially support
themselves and also to expatiate their egos.
Fortunately today
with technology increasing in accuracy and proving what is true. We
will be able to know that it is a pig's tooth instead of a whole new
species found in Nebraska.
Link to July 10, 1997: Neanderthal DNA Suggests a Separate, Unequal Being
an inferior being? Oh I understand, the Unequal Being is survived by
the inferior being. Because of DNA research, obviously they can no
longer make claims that something is billions of years old. But now
they expect me to swallow that we are cross bread of Homo sapiens and
Neanderthals. This article states that, "that theory has been debunked
by DNA analysis, but the debate continues." What debate? The discussion
is over!
It seems to me by reading this article we are seeing
an even bigger story than the subject of this article. In what is being
stated is a sense of insecurity as to what the truth really is. The
author uses expressions like "but seem to point" and "for approximately
30,000 years" and "was seemingly", and this last one "Fossils
indicate". You can make "Fossils indicate" what ever you want to argue.
What I am seeing here, which is the good news about this
article is the author's intimidation by the advances in modern science
and technology. He is very careful to stay in a safe position for fear
of scrutiny.
In my opinion, the shady history of the secular
anthropologists and their insane boasts over the last couple of hundred
years, and even right into our day, are now, to borrow a expression
from this author, "are seemingly" motivated by their want for more
money to fund their so called expeditions and experiments. If the
anthropologist of a generation ago stuck to what was found to be true
and honest, they would have to find another way to financially support
themselves and also to expatiate their egos.
Fortunately today
with technology increasing in accuracy and proving what is true. We
will be able to know that it is a pig's tooth instead of a whole new
species found in Nebraska.
Link to July 10, 1997: Neanderthal DNA Suggests a Separate, Unequal Being
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment